This article looks at a dividend investing strategy for income generation that shows strong returns and low drawdowns in back-testing.
Dividend investing ranks as one of the most popular and some would say straightforward stock picking strategies. It’s probably come about this way because dividend stocks are considered by many to be safer companies to invest in.
This is particularly true for large cap, utility, and blue chip stocks, the type of reliable companies that can be relied upon to pay out to shareholders year after year even when market conditions deteriorate.
As such, dividend stocks offer not only capital gains but income too.
As an example, consider an investment in Johnson & Johnson which managed to increase it’s dividend every year for something like 40 years between 1963 and 2004. An investment in 1963 would have returned a whopping 48% annual return in reinvested dividends alone.
However, just because a company pays out a regular dividend doesn’t mean it’s a sure thing and buying a stock based solely on a dividend is a flawed strategy.
Some stocks enjoy paying out high dividend yields because it attracts more investors to purchase shares. A volatile resource or gold mining stock is such an example. And since dividend yields move inversely to stock prices, a high yield can actually indicate a company that has been performing badly.
In general then, investors should look for reliable, steady dividends and companies that are able to increase dividends year after year, even through difficult trading conditions. Furthermore, through historical testing, I’ve found that the most reliable results are found by concentrating on stocks that yield between 2% and 7%.
So, when it comes to stock picking, dividends are very nice to have but they only form part of the story. Investors should consider all the other moving parts that make up a good investment and there are many factors to choose from.
In the strategy that follows, I look for stocks that are paying dividends of more than 2% but I also make sure the company has a decent balance sheet, in the form of a reasonable current ratio and a reasonable amount of cash. This is a portfolio strategy with a hedging mechanism that holds a maximum of 10 stocks at any one time.
Simple dividend strategy rules
• Dividend yield > 2%
• Increase in dividend over last year >5%
• Current ratio > 2
• Price-to-free-cash-flow < 10
• Ranking: Rank based on 52 week performance, choose best performing stocks first
• Dividend yield < 2%
• Hedge: If S&P 500 EPS estimates trend lower, move 100% into the iShares 7-10 year treasuries ETF $IEF
• Starting Capital: $100,000
• Portfolio size: Max 10 positions, equal weighting
• Commissions: $10 per trade, 0.5% slippage (variable)
• Universe: All fundamentals (USA)
• Liquidity: Position size no more than 5% of 20 day average volume
• Diversification: No more than 30% of portfolio allocated to one industry
• Rebalance period: Every 4 weeks
• Trades entered on next day open
Strategy in plain language
This is a portfolio strategy that selects stocks from portfolio123’s all fundamentals universe (all US stocks where fundamental data is available).
When a stock meets each of the buy rules specified above, it is bought and added to the portfolio. If there is more than one signal, each stock is ranked by it’s 52-week performance and the best performing stocks are bought first.
Position size is equal weighting with no margin and no one industry can take up more than 30% of the overall portfolio.
On the next rebalance period (4 weeks ahead) any stock whose dividend yield has dropped below 2% is sold and it drops off the portfolio.
The EPS for S&P 500 stocks is monitored and if the 5 week EPS trend crosses under the 20 week EPS trend, the portfolio is moved 100% into the $IEF, the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF. The aim of the hedging mechanism is to keep the portfolio safely in bonds during bear market conditions.
The simple dividend strategy was first run on the in-sample period between 5/1/2000 and 5/1/2010. The results are shown below: (The green blocks represent periods where the portfolio is hedged).
Now, the strategy was moved forward and run between 5/1/2010 and 5/1/2015:
Finally, the strategy was run through the full sample period 5/1/2000 to 5/1/2015:
As you can see, the results from this simple dividend investing strategy are good over the 15 year period. Annualised return is 16.77% with an overall win ratio of 66% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.79.
The maximum drawdown is just -20.37% and the strategy recorded only one losing year (2014):
The system represents a smooth equity curve and was able to turn $100,000 into over $1 million during the back-test, much better than the benchmark (S&P 500 Index).
This is a simple dividend strategy, suitable for capital growth and income generation that has potential. It was formulated in just a couple of hours using some simple, standard rules and no optimisation was undertaken.
At first glance, it looks to be a robust strategy with low drawdowns and low risk. One potential problem with the strategy is that it has not performed so well in the last couple of years. This might be a worry and more stress-testing needs to be undertaken.
Underperformance could be because dividend stocks have moved out of vogue. It could also be due to the choppy nature of recent EPS trends which has seen the hedge mechanism come into play on several occasions in recent years. It is advisable to test the strategy on various different start dates and conditions.
Overall, there are enough positives in these reports to suggest that investors are right to seek out good dividends and that the seeking of yield is indeed a worthwhile pursuit.
Thank You For Reading
Joe Marwood is an independent trader and the founder of Decoding Markets. He worked as a professional futures trader and has a passion for investing and building mechanical trading strategies. If you are interested in more quantitative trading strategies, investing ideas and tutorials make sure to check out our program Marwood Research.
This post expresses the opinions of the writer and is for information or entertainment purposes only. It is not a recommendation or personalised investment advice. Joe Marwood is not a registered financial advisor or certified analyst. The reader agrees to assume all risk resulting from the application of any of the information provided. Past performance, historical or simulated results are not a reliable indicator of future returns and may not account for real world settings. Financial trading is full of risk and margin trading can lead to financial losses totalling more than what is in your investment account. We take care to present accurate analysis but mistakes in backtesting and presenting of analysis regularly occur. Please read the Full disclaimer.
Thank you to everyone who takes the time to leave a comment. Your feedback, constructive criticism and identification of mistakes is welcome. In order to concentrate on work I may not have time to respond to all comments.